Animal cruelty offenders found likely to reoffend will be barred from keeping animals for one to five years under a new keeping-ban order. The Animal Protection Act amendment passed the National Assembly plenary session on the 1st and takes effect one year after promulgation.
According to the Kyunghyang Shinmun, prosecutors can ask a court for a keeping-ban order against a person indicted for animal cruelty if there is a risk of reoffending. If the court grants it, the person cannot raise, manage or care for animals for one to five years. The amendment passed the plenary session on the 1st and takes effect on the day one year after promulgation. The effective date has been reported as the end of October next year, but the exact date was not confirmed.
광고 문의 · 300×250Supervision and disposal
Those under the order are placed on probation for that period. The head of the probation office regularly checks compliance and must request protective measures from the local government if the person keeps animals in violation. Dailyvet reported that the committee-stage version set up to one year in prison or a fine of up to 10 million won for violations. Courts may also order owned animals to be handed to shelters or sold.
Protection of victim animals is also strengthened. Once indicted, abused animals can be separated and protected until a final ruling, and can be taken back if the keeping plan is not followed after return. Even without injury or illness, breaching minimum care duties draws a fine of up to 1 million won. Sharing animal cruelty videos online is also punishable.
Why only now
Since the Animal Protection Act was enacted in 1991, there had been no practical way to stop punished abusers from keeping animals again. The idea was discussed in the 2022 overhaul but fell through over concerns about property rights and the presumption of innocence. This time it was structured around risk of reoffending and a court decision.
The Korea Institute of Animal Welfare, Aware, and Korea Animal Rights Advocates called the amendment significant progress. They urged extending the separation measure to all animals, lengthening the ban and introducing a permanent ban.