South Korea's National Intelligence Service (NIS) and its trade ministry on Oct. 9 denied reports that the United States distrusts the NIS. Around the same time, news emerged that lawmaker Jung Chung-rae's US visa was on hold ahead of a field parliamentary audit in America, widening the political fight. The presidential office has issued no statement and is weighing how strongly to respond.
According to the Kyunghyang Shinmun on Oct. 9, the NIS and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy rejected as untrue a report that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had conveyed distrust of the NIS to Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan during talks on strategic investment in the US. The NIS said it had received no such content from any other agency.
광고 문의 · 300×250A day earlier, a report claimed that NIS director Lee Jong-seok had tried to visit the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), under the Pentagon, in March but that the US refused. The NIS called this false, said no such visit was planned, and asked that acts harming the national interest stop. The Kyunghyang did not name the US outlet behind these reports.
Another report said the US refused the NIS's participation at the fifth South Korea-US-Japan diplomatic working group on North Korean cyber threats, held in Washington in June. The NIS said there had been some misunderstanding months ago but that it was in the past, and that there is none between the two intelligence services now. The Kyunghyang read this as a de facto admission that the NIS was excluded at US request.
Jung's visa on hold, audit schedule changed
It was confirmed on Oct. 8 that the US visa of Jung Chung-rae, a four-term Democratic Party lawmaker on the Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee, was on hold. He had been assigned to the Americas team, due from Oct. 12 to visit the Korean embassy in Washington and the UN mission, among other sites, and was the only member of that team whose visa was held. Jung wrote on Facebook that he did not know why, and, unable to keep waiting in a state of neither approval nor refusal, urgently applied to move to the Europe team.
Reactions split along party lines. Democratic Party leader Kim Min-seok voiced 'strong regret' on X and urged the two governments to resolve it quickly; chief spokesman Park Sung-joon said constraining an allied parliament's audit does not fit alliance values. People Power Party floor spokesman Choi Eun-seok asked whether failed diplomacy and cracks in trust had played a part and called for a review. Jung himself asked people to refrain from overblown claims or remarks that could hurt the alliance.
Jung was also refused a US visa before an audit in 2013, when the State Department gave no reason; some commentators pointed to his involvement in the 1989 occupation of the US ambassador's residence as a student. In 2012 he attended an Americas audit on a single-entry visa. A Foreign Ministry official said it is not appropriate to link an individual visa case to overall Korea-US relations.
Opposition demands dismissals; ruling camp admits 'friction'
PPP leader Jang Dong-hyuk claimed the US is blocking the NIS director's visit and staff dispatches, and lawmaker Na Kyung-won demanded the immediate dismissal of Lee Jong-seok and Unification Minister Chung Dong-young. Democratic lawmaker Park Jie-won said he saw it as mischief by internal forces but acknowledged friction since Chung's remarks and the Coupang issue; Cha Ji-ho called the opposition's claims excessive.
The military also commented. Joint Chiefs Chairman Jin Yong-sung told the National Assembly defense committee on Oct. 8 that sharing of North Korea nuclear-related intelligence is partly restricted but readiness is not affected. The Kyunghyang reported that the US has partly limited intelligence sharing on North Korea since March, in protest at Chung's remarks about a North Korean uranium enrichment facility.
The presidential office issued no statement or briefing. It is said to be wary of spreading alliance concern while looking for a response level that does not fuel talk of a rift. Sending a senior figure such as National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac to Washington has been floated, though an official said this could not be confirmed.
A third perspective: separating fact from interpretation
A first point is that much of the dispute rests on anonymously sourced reports. None of the reports carried an official US position, and the Korean side denied some claims while calling another 'past.' On the visa, the Foreign Ministry insists it is an individual matter, so whether it signals the state of the relationship is a matter of interpretation. The ruling camp leans toward 'internal noise,' the opposition toward 'diplomatic failure.'
As a comparative frame, adjusting the scope of intelligence sharing between allies is commonly seen as a signal on a specific issue, distinct from a break in the whole relationship, and the Joint Chiefs said readiness is unaffected. Indicators to watch are how the field audits starting Oct. 12 go, how strongly the presidential office responds, and whether a senior envoy travels to Washington. Separately, in a Gallup Korea poll the same day, diplomacy was the top reason (24%) for approving of the president.