Per reports, the service would provide the president's posts to paying subscribers ahead of general release. Advance provision of potentially market-moving information has raised fairness concerns.

Critics worry that delivering an official's remarks first to paying users could cause information asymmetry and market distortion. Others counter that it is a legitimate commercial service.

Because politicians' and officials' remarks can affect markets and policy, the fairness of how they are released is important, observers note. Regulators' judgment is also of interest.

Hwagyo Sibo reports this from the standpoint of information fairness rather than for or against any individual, presenting arguments on both sides.