The EU is debating halting trade with West Bank settlements, and a legal review concluded it can be decided by majority rather than unanimity, foreign media reported, with member states divided.

Kaja Kallas, who oversees EU foreign policy, is reported to have said a majority of members agree on severing commerce with the settlements—a different approach from the prior structure, where one country's veto could block action.

The settlements issue is a sensitive matter entangling international-law debate and political interests. Even within the EU, positions on Israel and Palestine vary by country, and differences have continued over the degree and manner of joint action.

Whether the trade halt actually happens and in what scope depends on member-state votes and follow-up talks. Analysts say the change in decision method could lower the EU's threshold for approaching the matter.

Sinophone Bridge Times does not reduce this to either side's legitimacy and presents the international community's differing positions in balance. This article aims to convey facts and, given the sensitive subject, is handled with care.