The idea reported by CNN on Oct. 6 includes visits to US Energy Department national labs and Chinese counterparts, and the US is open to visits to its nuclear test site. Experts credited its confidence-building value while urging caution.
The United States and China are reportedly discussing mutual visits to nuclear-related facilities. CNN reported on Oct. 6 that the idea came first from the Chinese side. The talks cover US Energy Department national laboratories and their Chinese counterparts, and the US is open to visits to a nuclear test site.
광고 문의 · 300×250The two sides plan to pursue the possibility at in-person meetings in the coming months. No formal agreement or schedule has been set.
'Confidence-building' versus 'eyes wide open'
Paul Dean, a former acting assistant secretary of state, called the idea a very valuable confidence-building measure but said the United States should approach it with its eyes wide open. Gerald Brown, a former intelligence analyst at the Council on Foreign Relations, warned that China has long treated nuclear negotiations as a tool to win political concessions on Taiwan, and was not optimistic about the prospects.
The backdrop of an arms control gap
One backdrop is that the last arms control agreement between the US and Russia expired last year. President Trump pushed a three-way US-Russia-China arms control deal in his first term without result. The US is estimated to hold about 5,000 warheads and China about 600, with China expected to add several hundred more over the next decade.
China has drawn a line against joining trilateral arms control talks, citing the gap between its arsenal and America's. Whether the mutual-visit idea leads to negotiations or stops at limited transparency steps will be settled in the coming meetings.
A third view
Mutual visits to nuclear facilities resemble methods the US and Soviet Union used during the Cold War for verification and confidence building. Unlike then, however, a third nuclear power and regional issues are now entangled, so many see it as hard for this to remain a purely technical exchange. That is also why Taiwan's government and scholars are watching closely.